Charges come down in bloodhound investigation
Mason charged with two counts of misdemeanor animal abuse
By TERESA RESSEL
Daily Journal Staff Writer
Daily Journal Staff Writer
This photo was taken of Mosley last month. His hair is growing back in a different color and he has gained back the weight he lost. - Submitted photo
POTOSI — A Washington County Sheriff’s Department employee has been charged with two counts of animal abuse in connection with the bloodhound neglect and abuse investigation that began three months ago.
Lance E. Mason, 41, of Potosi, has been charged with two counts of misdemeanor animal abuse. Special Prosecuting Attorney Wendy Wexler Horn filed the charges in Washington County Associate Circuit Court Tuesday afternoon.
The charges allege Mason failed to provide adequate treatment for Mosley, by failing to provide the bloodhound with adequate food and water, and necessary medication as prescribed. If convicted, Mason could be sentenced up to a year in the county jail or fined $1,000 on each charge.
Horn said she spent many, many hours reviewing and thinking about the case. She said animal abuse by failing to provide adequate care is a misdemeanor. She said a felony charge by Missouri state law would need the element of torture.
At this time, she does not believe she will be filing any other charges against any other individuals. She said it seems clear the dog’s condition was diagnosed and deteriorated while under the care solely of Mason.
Mason was placed on paid administrative leave in late February after investigations into the dog’s care began.
On Wednesday morning, Washington County Sheriff Kevin Schroeder said he learned about the charges late Tuesday afternoon and he hadn’t had a chance to make a decision about Mason’s status with the department. He planned to make a decision by the end of business today.
He said a thorough investigation was done by his agency and a joint and independent investigation was done by the Humane Society. He believes they came to a truthful conclusion about the situation.
According to the probable cause statement signed by Missouri Humane Society Animal Cruelty Officers Kyle Held and Bonnie Dean, their investigation began on Feb. 28 at the request of Schroeder.
The dog was adopted from Midwest Bloodhound Rescue Inc. by Washington County Captain Charles Lalumondiere in January of 2007 with the purpose of using the dog for search and rescues.
The officers said in November of 2007, after the dog was seen by a veterinarian and treated for what was diagnosed as a skin allergy and “being in adequate body condition,” Lalumondiere turned over the dog to Mason for continued care and canine training.
In January, Mason told the captain and the sheriff that the dog was in “bad shape” and losing weight and hair. Mason took the dog to Lawson Veterinary Clinic on Jan. 17 where the dog showed a weight loss of 32 pounds and was diagnosed with demodectic mange.
The vet’s office recommended medications and food to help the dog in acquiring adequate caloric intake. They also recommended Mason change the dog’s bedding to place the dog in a more comfortable area due to the skin condition.
According to the vet, the medication and food were available at the vet clinic through a charge account, but those foods and medications were never acquired.
The officers said the condition of the dog deteriorated and no further vet care was provided.
Lalumondiere contacted Midwest Bloodhound Rescue, Inc. in late January to let them know the dog was unhealthy and the department wanted its money back or a new dog.
On Feb. 13, a volunteer went to pick up the dog. According to their Web site, the dog was found in a 4 by 4 dirt-floor pen outside a trailer. The dog had no food, water or bedding.
He was taken to an emergency vet where it was determined the dog suffered from frostbite, malnutrition and dehydration, severe hair loss (mange), ear and eye infections, seborrhea of the skin, cellulitis, and anemia.
The rescue group said before the adoption, the dog had a localized or small outbreak of mange but it had fully recovered.
Sandi Singer, executive director of Midwest Bloodhound Rescue, said last week that Mosley is still doing well.
“(He’s) pretty funny looking because his hair came back in a different color,” she said, adding that is common with hypothyroidism. “It should revert to normal color after the next yearly molt.
She said his foster family is adopting him. They have moved from Louisiana, Mo. to southern Missouri.
She said he is still very leery/frightened by new men. “It takes him awhile to be comfortable around them,” she said. “It will probably always be that way now.”
Teresa Ressel is a reporter for the Daily Journal and can be reached at 573-431-2010, ext. 179 or at tressel@dailyjournalonline.com.
Lance E. Mason, 41, of Potosi, has been charged with two counts of misdemeanor animal abuse. Special Prosecuting Attorney Wendy Wexler Horn filed the charges in Washington County Associate Circuit Court Tuesday afternoon.
The charges allege Mason failed to provide adequate treatment for Mosley, by failing to provide the bloodhound with adequate food and water, and necessary medication as prescribed. If convicted, Mason could be sentenced up to a year in the county jail or fined $1,000 on each charge.
Horn said she spent many, many hours reviewing and thinking about the case. She said animal abuse by failing to provide adequate care is a misdemeanor. She said a felony charge by Missouri state law would need the element of torture.
At this time, she does not believe she will be filing any other charges against any other individuals. She said it seems clear the dog’s condition was diagnosed and deteriorated while under the care solely of Mason.
Mason was placed on paid administrative leave in late February after investigations into the dog’s care began.
On Wednesday morning, Washington County Sheriff Kevin Schroeder said he learned about the charges late Tuesday afternoon and he hadn’t had a chance to make a decision about Mason’s status with the department. He planned to make a decision by the end of business today.
He said a thorough investigation was done by his agency and a joint and independent investigation was done by the Humane Society. He believes they came to a truthful conclusion about the situation.
According to the probable cause statement signed by Missouri Humane Society Animal Cruelty Officers Kyle Held and Bonnie Dean, their investigation began on Feb. 28 at the request of Schroeder.
The dog was adopted from Midwest Bloodhound Rescue Inc. by Washington County Captain Charles Lalumondiere in January of 2007 with the purpose of using the dog for search and rescues.
The officers said in November of 2007, after the dog was seen by a veterinarian and treated for what was diagnosed as a skin allergy and “being in adequate body condition,” Lalumondiere turned over the dog to Mason for continued care and canine training.
In January, Mason told the captain and the sheriff that the dog was in “bad shape” and losing weight and hair. Mason took the dog to Lawson Veterinary Clinic on Jan. 17 where the dog showed a weight loss of 32 pounds and was diagnosed with demodectic mange.
The vet’s office recommended medications and food to help the dog in acquiring adequate caloric intake. They also recommended Mason change the dog’s bedding to place the dog in a more comfortable area due to the skin condition.
According to the vet, the medication and food were available at the vet clinic through a charge account, but those foods and medications were never acquired.
The officers said the condition of the dog deteriorated and no further vet care was provided.
Lalumondiere contacted Midwest Bloodhound Rescue, Inc. in late January to let them know the dog was unhealthy and the department wanted its money back or a new dog.
On Feb. 13, a volunteer went to pick up the dog. According to their Web site, the dog was found in a 4 by 4 dirt-floor pen outside a trailer. The dog had no food, water or bedding.
He was taken to an emergency vet where it was determined the dog suffered from frostbite, malnutrition and dehydration, severe hair loss (mange), ear and eye infections, seborrhea of the skin, cellulitis, and anemia.
The rescue group said before the adoption, the dog had a localized or small outbreak of mange but it had fully recovered.
Sandi Singer, executive director of Midwest Bloodhound Rescue, said last week that Mosley is still doing well.
“(He’s) pretty funny looking because his hair came back in a different color,” she said, adding that is common with hypothyroidism. “It should revert to normal color after the next yearly molt.
She said his foster family is adopting him. They have moved from Louisiana, Mo. to southern Missouri.
She said he is still very leery/frightened by new men. “It takes him awhile to be comfortable around them,” she said. “It will probably always be that way now.”
Teresa Ressel is a reporter for the Daily Journal and can be reached at 573-431-2010, ext. 179 or at tressel@dailyjournalonline.com.
More Headlines: St. Louis frets over potential loss of Anheuser-Busch | PCC in lock-down Sunday
Ads by Yahoo!
Obama Urges Homeowners to Refinance
($200,000 Refinance under $1,059/mo) See Rates - No Credit Check Req.
SeeRefinanceRates.com
The comments below are from readers and do not represent the views of the Daily Journal
Triple D posted on Thursday, May 29th, 2008 at 2:15 pm
To: A reader, I think it started out that the Managing Editor was defending her staff against allegations of not reporting the truth. Looks like she may have let her emotions take it an inch too far, I think we can forgive her this one.
Report Abuse
A reader posted on Thursday, May 29th, 2008 at 11:30 am
My comment actually has nothing to do with the investigation but rather to question how appropriate is it for the managing editor to comment on this blog? Yes, you may have your personal opinion of the case and the individuals involved, but as a news person are you not supposed to be unbiased in your reporting? After reading your comments posted here I do not believe you have acted in that manner.
To Voter posted on Thursday, May 29th, 2008 at 10:10 am
To Voter:
If Sheriff Schroeder had been forthcoming with this information, it would have been printed. Today’s story written by Ms Ressel is an almost word for word reprint of his statement which was e-mailed by him to another reporter, who luckily was at work today. Otherwise, the Daily Journal would still not have his story. Ms. Ressel tried to get to the facts, but it would seem she was hindered in her investigation. Most people would wonder why the sheriff did not choose to share this information with her Wednesday morning when she called and asked for Mason’s status and what his reaction to the charges were.
Sherry Greminger, Managing Editor
If Sheriff Schroeder had been forthcoming with this information, it would have been printed. Today’s story written by Ms Ressel is an almost word for word reprint of his statement which was e-mailed by him to another reporter, who luckily was at work today. Otherwise, the Daily Journal would still not have his story. Ms. Ressel tried to get to the facts, but it would seem she was hindered in her investigation. Most people would wonder why the sheriff did not choose to share this information with her Wednesday morning when she called and asked for Mason’s status and what his reaction to the charges were.
Sherry Greminger, Managing Editor
Triple D posted on Thursday, May 29th, 2008 at 10:09 am
Voter...he did not hand it over to outsiders, the prosocutor did that. You need to get your facts straight. Give the paper a little credit, they can only report the infomation they have, if they had known the handler lied they wouldn't have published it. There are always more than one side to a story, someone claims the handler lied but is there proof of that?
Voter posted on Thursday, May 29th, 2008 at 9:54 am
Re: Managing editor
It seems to me that now that this investigation and the interviews thereof will be public knowledge that it might be a good idea to get the facts straight in this case. The lady that picked up Mosley recanted her story and outright lied and you have printed her story word for word for weeks. It is an election year and it seems to me that this story (before the facts and the investigation was even made public knowledge) has been front page news more than anything I have ever read before in your paper. I thought journalism was to get to the facts not rumors or gossip. And, reading the posts below calling our chief deputy "llama ears" is indicative of some of the comments made by the sheriff's opponents in this election. He handled this professionally as he always does. He handed this over to outsiders to investigate. He did his job. Why not print that!
It seems to me that now that this investigation and the interviews thereof will be public knowledge that it might be a good idea to get the facts straight in this case. The lady that picked up Mosley recanted her story and outright lied and you have printed her story word for word for weeks. It is an election year and it seems to me that this story (before the facts and the investigation was even made public knowledge) has been front page news more than anything I have ever read before in your paper. I thought journalism was to get to the facts not rumors or gossip. And, reading the posts below calling our chief deputy "llama ears" is indicative of some of the comments made by the sheriff's opponents in this election. He handled this professionally as he always does. He handed this over to outsiders to investigate. He did his job. Why not print that!
JR posted on Thursday, May 29th, 2008 at 9:34 am
The sheriff of Washington County put out a press release yesterday. Why hasn't the daily journal printed that? Just curious because it states the lady that picked up the dog lied. It gives a clearer picture of exactly what happened also. And, the investigation issues are a matter of public record now. It also states that the handler has been fired.
To Voter posted on Thursday, May 29th, 2008 at 9:21 am
The sheriff did indeed issue a statement on Wednesday, however, he e-mailed it at 12:46 p.m., and to a reporter who was not writing the story. Our deadline is 9:30 a.m., which the sheriff is well aware of. The reporter spoke to him by phone that morning, but did not receive his release. The Daily Journal is not biased against Washington County. If you will look at the Wednesday paper, you will see a story about a fundraiser to help with the medical bills of a Potosi couple who have a daughter who has spent three months in ICU at Children's Hospital. I would wonder if you think the St. Louis television stations are also biased against Washington County since they broadcast this story and, as far as I know, have not broadcast anything on the family in need of help?
Sherry Greminger,Managing Editor
Sherry Greminger,Managing Editor
REVoter posted on Thursday, May 29th, 2008 at 9:14 am
It may be that the sheriff's statement is just that, a statement by a disgraced and discredited sheriff. He has not been exactly trustworthy on other scandalous issues concerning the operation of his department or his personal life, why should anyone take his statement on this issue seriously?
legaleagle posted on Thursday, May 29th, 2008 at 4:29 am
This dog suffered by more than the one set of hands. All involved should have been brought up on charges. Seems Mason is taking the rap for the other two (sheriff and llama ears)I hope that Mason spills his guts, or maybe the other two have agreed to pay the fines for him.
Waiting for August!!!! Time to get the rats out of office!!!!
Waiting for August!!!! Time to get the rats out of office!!!!
PAID ADMINISTRATIVE LEAVE posted on Thursday, May 29th, 2008 at 12:06 am
I think it is so nice that Mr. Mason was put on PAID ADMINISTRATIVE LEAVE when the investigation started. I am glad that Washington County has the funds to support this leave. Hard to believe that it took 3 months to investigate this.
Karen posted on Wednesday, May 28th, 2008 at 7:58 pm
I don't understand what there is to think about. Mason should be fired immediately. An officer is required to protect and serve and that means an animal just as well as a human. The only think I find more despicable than an animal abuser..is an animal abuser who wears a badge and has vowed to service and protect. Good as Scum, in my book!!!!!!!!!!!!
Mi posted on Wednesday, May 28th, 2008 at 7:26 pm
I don't condone what these officers did, but have any of us stop to think maybe we aren't seeing the whole picture. I agree there is no reason that anyone should abuse an animal, but we are all aware of budgets restraints, not making excuses, but the officers are lot like most and are over worked and under paid. Maybe they were spending their time serving and protecting the people and unfortunately the dog was not their top priority. This is not meant as defending the accused but there are always two sides to every story.
Voter posted on Wednesday, May 28th, 2008 at 5:58 pm
The sheriff issued a statement today, why the paper did not print it is beyond me. Personally since this is a St. Francois County paper it seems that it is biased against ANYTHING that goes on in Washington County. Just my humble opinion.
Dog Lover posted on Wednesday, May 28th, 2008 at 5:33 pm
What a pathetic excuse for a human being Lance Mason is. He should be thrown in a 4 X 4 dirt floor with no food and no water and left there until he suffers the same ailments he inflicted upon this poor dog. If he were a member of my family, I'd be ashamed to claim him as a relative. Hopefully he won't get off with a slap on the wrist!
angie posted on Wednesday, May 28th, 2008 at 3:55 pm
I am outraged that 2 misdemeanor charges is all that came out of this...I am sure one person is not the only responsible party in this sad situation. I do not believe the charges fit the crime in this case! Like mentioned in other comments, If this is how an animal is to be treated, are the citizens going to be treated any better. I believe there has been a scapegoat put up for sacrifice and others are just going to be spared prosecution. It is just not right!
AS posted on Wednesday, May 28th, 2008 at 1:34 pm
Let's just hope that these charges do not get reduced to something ridiculous and this all just becomes a small slap on the wrist.
Mel posted on Wednesday, May 28th, 2008 at 1:16 pm
The officer in charge of the treatment of this animal is a pathetic excuse for a human being. We trusted him to protect our welfare and the welfare of those who cannot protect themselves (namely the animals) and now we see how he values life. Kudos to the attorney in charge, throw the book at this loser, and keep him out of public service.
Gentle Ben posted on Wednesday, May 28th, 2008 at 12:54 pm
Hey Strange ..Haven't you noticed it's an election year ! Seems anything goes and everyone believes ! Now I think that is strange ~~
Curious posted on Wednesday, May 28th, 2008 at 12:24 pm
I am just curious... If this is how he would treat an animal how does he treat a human? I would be scared to know that a "human being" of this type is sworn to "serve and protect" the community. I know everyone deserves a second chance but would you want someone like this patroling the streets watching out for your children? I hope the sheriff makes the correct and the most moral decision in this situation.
moflash posted on Wednesday, May 28th, 2008 at 12:03 pm
Congratulations Wendy Horn on your dedication of 3 months work on FINALLY making a decision on a dog. Now lets move on to convicting some of these drawn out drug cases you have!
Good job Wendy posted on Wednesday, May 28th, 2008 at 11:15 am
Great job Wendy Horn for doing the right thing in spite of any political pressure to sweep this under the rug! The officer made a bad choice in being neglectful and should face a Judge!
sherry posted on Wednesday, May 28th, 2008 at 11:13 am
Ibelieive any one who abuses an animal
in any shape r form needs to get some form of punishing.
They think their big ,and strong to take thier feelings out on an innocent
animal. put them in a pen with an human
and let them see how they would like to be treated with the same things they do to animals.
in any shape r form needs to get some form of punishing.
They think their big ,and strong to take thier feelings out on an innocent
animal. put them in a pen with an human
and let them see how they would like to be treated with the same things they do to animals.
Strange posted on Wednesday, May 28th, 2008 at 10:53 am
Washington County seems to be having alot of issues with their law enforcement lately. Wonder what's going on????
Outraged posted on Wednesday, May 28th, 2008 at 10:50 am
I hope the judge who decides this case throws the book at Mr. Mason. It is unbelievable that a human being can treat a poor defenseless animal in this manner. The laws should be much stricter when it comes to animal abuse. It's just heartbreaking to think what this poor dog suffered at the hands of this so called man of the law.
Local News
- Eating out Sunday can help Shop with a Cop
- Farmington man gets 7 years for assault
- Small piece of history is endangered
- Flu, high water results in school closings
- Veterans Day
Most Commented - Last 7 Days
- Hundreds line up for energy aid (42)
- Judge sentences Osburn to five years (22)
- Schools take steps to fight drugs after possible overdose deaths (14)
- Roy wins (10)
- Bell-ringing season begins soon (9)
Most Viewed - Last 7 Days
More: Most Viewed
Most Emailed - Last 7 Days
advertisement

