Missouri State Football Rankings
Wednesday, November 5, 2008 11:38 AM CST
The state rankings for Missouri high school football voted on by a 12-person panel of sportswriters and broadcasters. First-place votes in parenthesis, followed by won-loss record, points received and last week's ranking.
CLASS 6
Rank, Team W-L Pts LW
1. Rockhurst (12) 9-1 60 1
2. Blue Springs South 8-2 48 2
3. Blue Springs 9-1 36 3
4. Jefferson City 7-2 24 4
5. Fort Zumwalt West 8-2 12 5
Others receiving votes: None.
CLASS 5
1. Raymore-Peculiar (9) 9-1 57 1
2. Timberland (3) 10-0 47 2
3. Raytown South 9-1 30 3
4. Fort Osage 8-2 25 4
5. Lee's Summit West 7-3 16 5
Others receiving votes: Eureka (9-1) 5.
CLASS 4
1. Kearney (8) 10-0 116 1
2. Union (3) 10-0 109 2
3. Webb City (1) 10-0 99 3
4. Smith-Cotton 10-0 84 4
5. MICDS 9-0 66 5
6. Harrisonville 8-2 52 7
7. Helias 8-1 42 8
8. Carthage 8-2 10 10
9. St. Charles West 9-1 21 -
10. Normandy 9-1 10 6
Others receiving votes: Hannibal (8-2) 8, Farmington (8-2) 2, Bolivar (9-1) 1, Staley (8-2) 1.
CLASS 3
1. Chillicothe (9) 10-0 117 1
2. Monett (3) 10-0 109 2
3. Holden 10-0 95 3
4. Mountain Grove 9-1 78 4
5. Sullivan 9-1 71 5
6. Pleasant Hill 8-2 69 6
7. Ste. Genevieve 9-1 37 7
8. O'Hara 8-2 36 8
9. Potosi 8-2 12 -
10. Salem 8-2 11 -
Others receiving votes: Oak Grove (7-3) 4, Smithville (7-3) 4, St. Francis Borgia (8-2) 3, Cassville (6-4) 2.
CLASS 2
1. Maplewood (12) 10-0 120 1
2. Maryville 9-1 105 2
3. Clark County 10-0 91 3
4. Centralia 10-0 78 4
5. Blair Oaks 9-1 77 5
6. Hogan Prep 10-0 62 6
7. Fair Grove 10-0 54 7
8. Lawson 9-1 33 8
9. Carrollton 9-1 28 9
10. Mountain View-Liberty 8-2 9 10t
Others receiving votes: Monroe City (8-2) 3.
CLASS 1
1. Orrick (12) 10-0 120 1
2. Tipton 10-0 106 2
3. Hamilton-Penney 9-0 95 3
4. Thayer 8-1 87 4
5. Hayti 8-1 66 5
6. Valle Catholic 8-2 55 6
7. Miller 9-1 43 7
8. Princeton 9-1 35 8
9. Adrian 9-1 27 9
10. West Platte 9-1 21 10
Others receiving votes: Greenfield (9-1) 5.
Published: Wednesday, November 05, 2008.
Updated: Wednesday, November 5, 2008 11:38 AM CST

Reader Comments (
0)
The comments below are from readers and do not represent the views of the Daily Journal