No lions, tigers or bears in city limits

Park Hills council amends animal regulation ordinance
By PAULA BARR
Daily Journal Staff Writer
Published: Friday, November 14, 2008
Updated: Friday, November 14, 2008 9:39 AM CST
Park Hills City Council officially banned housing of mountain lions within city limits Thursday night. The same goes for lions, tigers, bears and 17 other wild animals.

The amended animal regulations ordinance also prevents city residents from having a leopard, ocelot, jaguar, jaguarondi, cheetah, margay, Canada lynx, bobcat, panther, hyena, wolf, coyote, fox, wild cat, wolf hybrid, nonhuman primate, or any deadly dangerous or poisonous reptile. Boa constrictors and pythons less than eight feet long are exempt from the new provision, as are events where a special permit has been issued by the city for entertainment purposes.

The ordinance was amended in response to a request to keep a mountain lion in city limits. City Administrator John Kennedy said the city denied that request under existing public safety laws. However, Kennedy told the council the request pointed out the need for a more specific ordinance. The amendment passed 6-0, with Ward I Councilman Mike Glore and Ward IV Councilman Terry Barnett absent.

Park Hills Fire Chief Rick Whaley accepted a $500 check from AmerenUE, presented by Justin Kelly for use on safety equipment. Whaley said the department plans to spend the money on an accountability plan that would keep track of all fire personnel during a fire.

“God forbid we have a collapse and we don’t know where some people are,” Whaley said.

Accountability plans range from $100 to $32,000. The department will look at different plans and decide what will work best. If they spend the $500 and turn in the receipts, they could be eligible for another $500, Whaley said.

Whaley also discussed the department’s recommendation for rescue extrication equipment and an air bag lifting system from among four bids. The council unanimously approved Whaley’s recommendation that they accept the $29,309 bid for Holmatro Rescue Equipment, which includes a power unit, spreader, cutter, ram and 5-bag lifting kit.

The council amended a park regulations ordinance to allow for extended use of the new walking path in Columbia Park. The new .63-mile lighted trail will be open from 5 a.m. to 10 p.m., an hour longer than other city parks. Other changes included closing the Park Hills Sports Complex 30 minutes after the lights are turned off after the last game or close of event. The park will remain closed until 8 a.m. When there are no activities scheduled, the complex will be closed from sunset until 8 a.m.

In other business, the council:

• Agreed to pave Hovis Farm Road with three inches of compacted asphalt, using about $132,921 in rollover funds from last year;

•  Read, but took no action, on a draft for excavation regulations;

• Tabled an ordinance dealing with auditing services and an ordinance that would make one-way a segment of an alley that runs between Crane and Haney streets;

• Accepted three annexation petitions and set hearing for each during the Dec. 9 regular council meeting.

Paula Barr is a reporter for the Daily Journal and can be reached at 573-431-2010, ext. 172 or at pbarr@dailyjournalonline.com.

Share Story

E-mail this story E-mail   Print this story Print   Share  
Post To MySpace! MySpace
   Digg! Digg This!   Delicious Delicious       
Article Comments Article Comments (16)
The comments below are from readers and do not represent the views of the Daily Journal.
catlady posted at Saturday, November 29th, 2008 at 8:19 pm

To the last person who commented-can you write/speak english or are you just trying to sound smart.Have you ever heard of Tiger Island?They have proven that taking tigers when they are cubs and raising them that you can control these wild animals as so with the mt.lions a.k.a. cougars.When they are taught from right after birth,like as you would raise your chiildren right, that these animals can be taught and trained to behave.Yes you cant take the wild instincts out of these cats but you can learn how to control it and it takes a special person that cares enough about these type of cats to do so.I have seen this for my own eyes and know how to and Im not afraid of cougars.For you "scaredy cats" this would definetly not be for you because you would be the ones that end up injured or the pulic or just not care properly for them.One comment on the "declawing"I have never been for that but in this case,these animals ,or us, have no choice to house them and raise them for it is natural for them to scratch with sharp claws so they would have to be removed.
catlady posted at Saturday, November 29th, 2008 at 8:06 pm

For the last person who cant speak english and wants to sound smart-have you ever heard of Tiger Island?They raise large tigers from cubs and it has been proven it is possible to do what has been done with cougars,aka mt. lions,plus I have seen with my own eyes what can be done and monitored this person with this type of animal and its just like how you raise your children and the outcome will result from that.No you cant take all wild insticts out of a wild animal but you can control them and apparently it takes a strong person like me who cares enough for these animals to do so and not for people like the rest of you that are "scaredy cats".Im not afraid of these cats or afraid of caring for them and keeping the public safe so I guess what Im saying, you are not the type of person to understand this since you dont have the heart to care for animals like I do.
anomalouspropagation posted at Tuesday, November 25th, 2008 at 11:30 am

Catlady-it is clearlt obvious since your last post that you are not right. It has to be showed and shown and the such but it is declawed? For what purpose-not to scratch the furniture?
Does the evolutionary and scientific classification of Feline mean anything to you and the cute lil kitty?
the old addage of "it doesn't bite" is fookish as the other addage says "it's got teeth doesn't it".
By the way, what zoological institute did you study in? Under who did you intern? No need to answer-as this is rhetorical and it is painfully obvious that you did NOT write a dissertation and your education on this "cat" is pamphlet deep.
Guess what, we had a raccoon as a kid-dumbest thing dad ever did. Animals are meant to be in the wild.
kat posted at Tuesday, November 25th, 2008 at 10:50 am

Nobody should have the right to "own" any sort of wild animal, let alone declaw it. They're not pets, they belong out in their natural habitat or with people that are properly trained to take care of them. Not stuck in cages, without claws and dependent on someone that wants to have them as a pet feed them. Totally ridiculous and inhumane.
catlady posted at Monday, November 24th, 2008 at 7:23 pm

Ok first off,to the comment about the great dane being so nice the people that lived behind me as a child had a one and it was until it took a bite out of the owners eye.Another dog to consider is the rothweiler-hello so aggressive.For the comment about the mt. lion being so aggressive,not if it raised properly,not trained,showed,
moved around to be shown to where it doesnt know its own domain.They have to have their territory and thats why nobody other than the one who raises it should be around it.You can believe what you read from any exerpt,I have this type of cat raised and under the control of a human and it is possible and very safe for the owner and as for others around it Ive never seen anything bad but I would never put my cat in that position to have a choice of aggression.Gosh dangerous preditor..its not a tiger,its a cougar(mt lion)raised from a cub,in double cages,monitored by dept of wildlife very often,tagged to be tracked,declawed,and dependant on owner for food-dont bite the hand that feeds them unless they are mistreated and abused to be show animals.Some will never understand things they havent seen.
niknak posted at Friday, November 21st, 2008 at 12:52 pm

To Catlady...it appears you are the one that needs to do the homework. First of all, you mentioend Great Danes are aggressive...WRONG. In fact they are stated NOT to be good watch dogs because of their docile nature. In fact SEVERAL websites refer to them as gentle giants, docile and affectionate and very patient with children. I have a great dane and he sure meets those qualities.

Secondly, I have to question the mental stability of one who would EVEN think of wanting a Mountain Lion as a "pet". Here is an excerpt from another website
Mountain lions sit on the top of the food chain and are capable of preying on anything within their territories. Their natural enemies include other large predators. Mountain Lions do not like to share their territory and will attack anything that invades it.

It's not like this is a sweet little kitty. It is a large, dangerous predator. What's next for you? Wanting to keep Bears and Wolves?
Resident6 posted at Friday, November 21st, 2008 at 12:23 pm

This is what we get when the economy is bad and the circus stops hiring.
catlady posted at Thursday, November 20th, 2008 at 7:13 pm

To reply to some of the stupid things I have been asked .First off,you have to understand there has to be 2 cages,this is incase it would accidently get thru and double locks on them and as for a tornado, I dont see any difference in some of my distant neighbors having large and aggressive dogs like boxers,great danes, and pit bulls that could get loose at any time and take a bite out of me or ur child.One more thing, this mt lion is not a tiger and is a cub and will be declawed,and taught strictly not to bite,never eat raw meat and can be controlled by humans.I had a freind that had one,I know.People are breeding them in close southern towns around you and have them and you dont even know that.I would never take in any animal that would be a threat to my family or anyone else-ever.Do your homework on the subject and you would understand.
T-Bone posted at Wednesday, November 19th, 2008 at 10:59 am

to say a mountain lion living in the city poses no danger is just a bit rediculous. It has to be enclosed in some type of fence and every fence I have seen has a gate that one opens from time to time. While Im sure you wouldn't let the cat out of purpose, things happen. A tornado could come and tear up the fence letting the animal go. Im sure there are numberous other possibilites that could occur.
anomalouspropagation posted at Sunday, November 16th, 2008 at 11:38 am

catlady-Must be in the "vineyard hills area for the acres but even if they did approve the request for the "cat" I still think you have not really thought out your wanton desire. TOTB-will love this, I had an uncle who wanted a Bengal Tiger and got one and lived out by the River. He had no more problems with theft but the fact was this was a wild animal not meant to be domesticated and it "ate him out of house and home." If you have the insurance, the property, the degress/knowledge to care for such an animal, money to feed and vet care- then with all of your research would lean toward leaving this cat wild. However, wanton desires are just that. Good luck and I hope your significant other isn't "Batman". Probably more like the Joker and the Riddler. But if he's the Penguin, Park hills drivers be on the look out for birds wearing tuxedos.
Zip Line posted at Saturday, November 15th, 2008 at 5:04 pm

catlady,
If you want to be stupid, be my guest. Just don't put your neighbors in danger. They are wild animals and meant to stay that way.
catlady posted at Saturday, November 15th, 2008 at 1:22 pm

Im the citizen who requested a mountain lion in city limits but Im on acres.If they would talk to the conservation dept. they would understand the security you have to have to have this animal and would not be a danger to the public.No thanks to the city for me getting a cat or a 40-50 ft section of asphalt between what they call alotted for and where my driveway starts.Next time I move it will definetly not be in the city limits again.
Resident6 posted at Friday, November 14th, 2008 at 3:30 pm

Yes, unfortunately it is for real. Someone actually wants to keep a mountain lion inside of city limits. I can't help but laugh at the ordinance but at the same time think about how sad it is that the ordinance is necessary in the first place. Why on earth would anyone want to keep such dangerous animals? Has everyone forgotten what happened to Roy of Siegfried and Roy? Having three children in my house under the age of 10 I know that I don't want that thing getting out of its cage and harming my children.
Zip Line posted at Friday, November 14th, 2008 at 12:27 pm

Watch out T-Bone, I hear Hippos are next.
Tired of people posted at Friday, November 14th, 2008 at 12:01 pm

Was this really a problem?
T-Bone posted at Friday, November 14th, 2008 at 11:09 am

Sure am glad they didn't outlaw my Hippo. :)
Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to leave comments

*Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 

Not a member? Register now.

Member Center Member Center

advertisement

signup E-mail updates

Get news update delivered to your inbox.
E-Mail:
First:
Last:
Zip:

Featured Marketplace Ad

Search the YP
Featured Businesses