Massey cleared of manslaughter charge
Horn says judge used Castle Doctrine to dismiss charges
By TERESA RESSEL
Daily Journal Staff Writer
Daily Journal Staff Writer
FARMINGTON — A manslaughter charge that was filed against a rural Bonne Terre man following a coroner’s inquest was dismissed by a judge Monday.
Donald R. Massey, a former police officer, was charged in May with first-degree involuntary manslaughter after a coroner’s jury determined a felony had been committed in connection with the January shooting death of Eugene Koester. The charge alleged Massey recklessly caused the death of Koester by shooting him.
However, during a preliminary hearing on Monday, Associate Circuit Court Judge James H. Kelly, determined the case should not be bound over for trial in the circuit court because there was not probable cause to believe Massey had committed a felony crime.
“The judge dismissed the case based on the Castle Doctrine,” St. Francois County Prosecuting Attorney Wendy Wexler Horn said.
The Castle Doctrine, a new state statute related to self defense, in part, states a person may not use deadly force unless they believe such force is needed to protect him or her from a forcible felony. Horn said in this case, the forcible felony was an assault as Massey alleges Koester was trying to choke him.
The judge heard testimony at the preliminary hearing from two deputies, a pathologist and Massey’s wife. Massey’s attorney, Chris Hartmann, played a recording of the 911 call for the judge.
During the preliminary hearing, Shirley Massey, Donald’s wife, testified Koester lived across the street and was a friend until a fight in September. The fight resulted in Donald Massey having to get stitches in his face.
She said there had been another incident, too. They had helped him out a lot and didn’t hate him, she said.
When Koester showed up drunk at their house Jan. 18, Koester told her that he and her husband had “made up.”
She said while her husband was calling his mother, Koester got upset at him and told him to get off the phone because he wanted to talk to him.
She said her husband told Koester he was going to bed and Koester should leave. She said when her husband went to the bedroom, Koester made a comment that he was going to beat up her husband. Koester followed Massey into his bedroom.
She said she heard yelling and a scuffle. She said she heard Koester say that he wanted to settle things now. Soon after, she said she heard him say “shoot me” and “put me out of my misery.” She said she then heard a gunshot and called 911.
The prosecutor asked Shirley why she didn’t call police or get an ex-parte order against Koester after the previous incidents. She said her husband asked her not to because he didn’t want to cause any trouble for Koester. They believed he had an outstanding warrant in another state.
Shirley said her husband did have to go to the hospital after one incident to get stitches. He told the doctor he had fallen off a horse.
Horn asked why she didn’t call police when Koester threatened her husband before the shooting that night. She said they had had several arguments and they always patched things up.
Massey told police that Koester came in his bedroom, grabbed him and tried to choke him. He said he spun away and got a rifle that was under his sleeping bag on the bed. He pointed the gun at Koester and told him to leave.
Massey said Koester grabbed the barrel and pointed it at himself, telling Massey to “put me out of my misery.” He said at some point, the rifle discharged and Koester was shot in the chest.
Hartmann described the incident as a “clear-cut case of self defense.” He said on that night, Koester had attacked Massey like he had done before and Massey had no other choice but to defend himself. He said Koester was a younger and stronger man.
Horn had argued Massey had other options to take before it escalated to a shooting.
Teresa Ressel is a reporter for the Daily Journal and can be reached at 573-431-2010, ext. 179 or at tressel@dailyjournalonline.com.
Donald R. Massey, a former police officer, was charged in May with first-degree involuntary manslaughter after a coroner’s jury determined a felony had been committed in connection with the January shooting death of Eugene Koester. The charge alleged Massey recklessly caused the death of Koester by shooting him.
However, during a preliminary hearing on Monday, Associate Circuit Court Judge James H. Kelly, determined the case should not be bound over for trial in the circuit court because there was not probable cause to believe Massey had committed a felony crime.
“The judge dismissed the case based on the Castle Doctrine,” St. Francois County Prosecuting Attorney Wendy Wexler Horn said.
The Castle Doctrine, a new state statute related to self defense, in part, states a person may not use deadly force unless they believe such force is needed to protect him or her from a forcible felony. Horn said in this case, the forcible felony was an assault as Massey alleges Koester was trying to choke him.
The judge heard testimony at the preliminary hearing from two deputies, a pathologist and Massey’s wife. Massey’s attorney, Chris Hartmann, played a recording of the 911 call for the judge.
During the preliminary hearing, Shirley Massey, Donald’s wife, testified Koester lived across the street and was a friend until a fight in September. The fight resulted in Donald Massey having to get stitches in his face.
She said there had been another incident, too. They had helped him out a lot and didn’t hate him, she said.
When Koester showed up drunk at their house Jan. 18, Koester told her that he and her husband had “made up.”
She said while her husband was calling his mother, Koester got upset at him and told him to get off the phone because he wanted to talk to him.
She said her husband told Koester he was going to bed and Koester should leave. She said when her husband went to the bedroom, Koester made a comment that he was going to beat up her husband. Koester followed Massey into his bedroom.
She said she heard yelling and a scuffle. She said she heard Koester say that he wanted to settle things now. Soon after, she said she heard him say “shoot me” and “put me out of my misery.” She said she then heard a gunshot and called 911.
The prosecutor asked Shirley why she didn’t call police or get an ex-parte order against Koester after the previous incidents. She said her husband asked her not to because he didn’t want to cause any trouble for Koester. They believed he had an outstanding warrant in another state.
Shirley said her husband did have to go to the hospital after one incident to get stitches. He told the doctor he had fallen off a horse.
Horn asked why she didn’t call police when Koester threatened her husband before the shooting that night. She said they had had several arguments and they always patched things up.
Massey told police that Koester came in his bedroom, grabbed him and tried to choke him. He said he spun away and got a rifle that was under his sleeping bag on the bed. He pointed the gun at Koester and told him to leave.
Massey said Koester grabbed the barrel and pointed it at himself, telling Massey to “put me out of my misery.” He said at some point, the rifle discharged and Koester was shot in the chest.
Hartmann described the incident as a “clear-cut case of self defense.” He said on that night, Koester had attacked Massey like he had done before and Massey had no other choice but to defend himself. He said Koester was a younger and stronger man.
Horn had argued Massey had other options to take before it escalated to a shooting.
Teresa Ressel is a reporter for the Daily Journal and can be reached at 573-431-2010, ext. 179 or at tressel@dailyjournalonline.com.
More Headlines: MAC Foundation grant quadruples gift value | Plenty of takers for man's basement pile of coal
Ads by Yahoo!
Obama Urges Homeowners to Refinance
$90,000 Refinance $499/mo. See Rates- No Credit Check Req.
SeeRefinanceRates.com
The comments below are from readers and do not represent the views of the Daily Journal
mbser posted on Wednesday, December 3rd, 2008 at 10:07 am
Hmmmm, maybe the coroner should take note and quit trying to push frivolous cases. When there is no evidence that a crime occurred then why drag people into court where they have to relive a bad situation? DFS operates on a similar basis - speculation and conjecture.
Report Abuse
Cantwell Native posted on Saturday, November 29th, 2008 at 8:56 am
I knew Mr. Massey years ago when I was a teenager and he was a Desloge police officer.
I always respected him and don't believe he would have done what he did without justification.
I have no sympathy for anyone killed after entering another person's home and threatening them with violence.
I always respected him and don't believe he would have done what he did without justification.
I have no sympathy for anyone killed after entering another person's home and threatening them with violence.
SHOWME posted on Friday, November 28th, 2008 at 8:45 am
I feel sorry for Mr. massy and his Wife. Everyone thinks its an easy thing to pull a trigger and take another humans life, but I assure you, no matter how justified the shooting, it will haunt them for years to come. God bless them in this trying time.
commonsensesayer posted on Wednesday, November 26th, 2008 at 8:04 am
First I'll say this. The passage of the castle law was one of the biggest and best "common sense" laws passed.
But what what gets me is, how could a coroner's jury even recomend that charges be filed against this man? An intoxicated man threated violence against someone, who's house he was in, and follows him onto his bedroom. Gee, what was this man's intentions? A younger, stonger man who is intoxicated could have beaten Mr. Massey to death. So he protected himself, and his wife by shooting this man. Where's the felony?
And for our prosecuting attorney to say that Mr. Massey had other options! It is quite possible that had Mr. Massey attempted "other options", Mrs. Horn would have been prosecuting the deseased for 2nd degree murder, instead of Mr. Massey for defending himself.
I'll be interested to see the opinions of some of our more liberal viewed bloggers.
ching, ching, there's my two pennies.
But what what gets me is, how could a coroner's jury even recomend that charges be filed against this man? An intoxicated man threated violence against someone, who's house he was in, and follows him onto his bedroom. Gee, what was this man's intentions? A younger, stonger man who is intoxicated could have beaten Mr. Massey to death. So he protected himself, and his wife by shooting this man. Where's the felony?
And for our prosecuting attorney to say that Mr. Massey had other options! It is quite possible that had Mr. Massey attempted "other options", Mrs. Horn would have been prosecuting the deseased for 2nd degree murder, instead of Mr. Massey for defending himself.
I'll be interested to see the opinions of some of our more liberal viewed bloggers.
ching, ching, there's my two pennies.
tiredofthebull posted on Tuesday, November 25th, 2008 at 2:55 pm
BT Marine - right on.. be the same with me... point a gun at me, expect to see the same. (if i'm allowed to carry one)
By the way.. thanks for serving.. didn't do any military myself, but can't thank you guys enough..
Happy holidays all
By the way.. thanks for serving.. didn't do any military myself, but can't thank you guys enough..
Happy holidays all
SLBpoker posted on Tuesday, November 25th, 2008 at 1:42 pm
It is about time our justice system gets it right. Thank you judge Kelly. Its good to see people defending themselves.
bhunter32000 posted on Tuesday, November 25th, 2008 at 10:53 am
Justice sometimes works! I knew Don years ago and I don't think he would intend to kill someone. Congratulations Don.
Murph posted on Monday, November 24th, 2008 at 7:08 pm
Good point peterandre. LOL
I too would like a link to the original story. You would think I would remember something about it being it's breaking news and all. I must have missed something.
I too would like a link to the original story. You would think I would remember something about it being it's breaking news and all. I must have missed something.
D3 posted on Monday, November 24th, 2008 at 4:53 pm
Also is you look at this one there are all the related stories listed upper right.
D3 posted on Monday, November 24th, 2008 at 4:52 pm
bt_marine...here's a link to the original story.
http://www.dailyjournalonline.com/articles/2008/01/21/news/doc4794ccc8330a9626178152.txt
http://www.dailyjournalonline.com/articles/2008/01/21/news/doc4794ccc8330a9626178152.txt
bt_marine posted on Monday, November 24th, 2008 at 1:32 pm
I tried to find the original article about this story and couldn't. If it has anything to do with what tired of the bull says, they might have figured it was justifiable homicide. That would have also be the case if I was at burger king or r&b's when they were "robbed". Nothing like that ever happens when I'm around.... sheesh..
peterandre posted on Monday, November 24th, 2008 at 1:15 pm
fatsdanabo: wasn't OJ Simpson tried on the West Coast?
tiredofthebull posted on Monday, November 24th, 2008 at 11:52 am
what were the circumstances? It is allowable by law to kill in self defense in MO, provided it is your only means to surviving.
Local News
- The world is her home
- Christmas comes in with a growl
- Firefighter hopes good Samaritan will find his wallet
- Deason family raises money to honor soldiers killed in Iraq
- Never too young to pick a career
Most Commented - Last 7 Days
- Hundreds line up for energy aid (42)
- Judge sentences Osburn to five years (22)
- Schools take steps to fight drugs after possible overdose deaths (15)
- Bell-ringing season begins soon (10)
- Two die in early morning accident (8)
Most Viewed - Last 7 Days
More: Most Viewed
Most Emailed - Last 7 Days
advertisement

