Council to hear leash law complaints

Park Hills has full slate of business for tonight's meeting
By PAULA BARR
Daily Journal Staff Writer
Published: Tuesday, November 24, 2009
Updated: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 11:08 AM CST
Park Hills City Council will again hear complaints about its leash law during tonight’s meeting at city hall.

During the 7 p.m. regular monthly meeting, which was rescheduled from last week, the council also will address issues including changes in a compensation ordinance to allow council members to choose not to be paid for their service, revisions to the pay matrix, appointment of a municipal judge, a contract for installation of Leadington booster station, and the annual Christmas decoration contest. The meeting follows a 6:30 p.m. executive session at the Park Hills Depot Conference Room.

During public session, Tom and Kim Gibson have asked to present their side in an attack involving at least four dogs, all of which were being walked on leashes.

In July, Peggy Thomas asked the city to tighten an ordinance that deals with vicious dogs. She told the council that her two dogs were attacked by two other dogs on March 21 while she was in a wheelchair. All the dogs were on leashes, but the other owner could not control her animals and they ran across the street after Thomas’s dogs and her neighbor’s dog, Thomas said.

One of the large dogs bit and shook Thomas’ Yorkshire terrier. The vet bill came to $94.10. She reported the attack to police and the case went to Municipal Court. In response, the city passed an ordinance that makes clear a dog or cat will not be declared vicious unless it has bitten, scratched, clawed or otherwise attacked a person, dog or cat two times without unreasonable provocation. A police report or court appearance is not necessarily required for both attacks. Evidence of a past attack is admissible as evidence, as is the conduct of the victim. The owner of a vicious dog or cat is responsible for keeping that animal restrained from running at large in the city at any time.

The Gibsons also want the ordinance amended and blames the city for the fine Kim Gibson had to pay in municipal court.

According to the couple’s request to speak, they believe the city’s leash law is weak.

“The way the law is written now, you don’t even have to have your dog on a leash!” Thomas Gibson wrote. “When my wife was walking our dogs on a 6-foot leash, a woman in a wheelchair had three dogs on 25-foot expandable leashes. When her small dogs attacked our dogs, my wife got a fine and was found guilty of a city ordinance.

“The city’s lack of a leash law cost my family $215 plus the stress of a trial! My dog hurt her dog, and that made us guilty.”

City ordinances state that animal ownership is a responsibility that includes mandates for care and maintenance. For example, owners may not allow dogs or cats to run free at any time within city limits. Animals found at large are taken to the pound.

The city also requires dogs and cats to have annual rabies vaccinations. Owners must be able to show a current certificate of vaccination. Failure to do so is a city ordinance violation. By law in the city, owners are responsible for the actions of their cat or dog and are required to keep their pet from injuring life or property.

Violation of the animal ordinances could result in a fine, jail time, restitution, or a combination of any of the three.

Following reports by City Administrator John Kennedy, the council will address an ordinance that establishes rules for increasing council compensation, decreasing compensation for the municipal judge and establishing rates of compensation for the city attorney and city counselor. The ordinance provides an opportunity for councilmen to opt out of receiving compensation.

The council will review the impact of giving hazard pay increases of 2 percent, 3 percent or 4 percent to full time police officers other than the chief. The council has been asked to choose a rate of increase and amend the rate of pay for full time officers.

The total salary increases for the 12 officers would amount to $8,233.55, $12,335.33 or $16,447.10 annually. Hourly pay for officers, corporals and sergeants would increase from $16.27 to $16.60, $16.76 or $16.92. The hourly pay for lieutenants would increase from $17.51 to $17.86, $18.04 or $18.21.

The council also will consider whether to annex the 66-acre former Dix greenhouse site and construct a truck entrance to facilitate commercial use of the property. The current owners are willing for the property to be annexed, after which the city would list the site on Missouri Location One to attract commercial development. The truck entrance would be done on state right-of-way property.

In other business, the council will:

• Consider a resolution that would exclude St. Francois County from inclusion in the St. Louis air quality non-containment area;

• Decide whether to reappoint Sean McCarver as municipal judge to a new two-year term;

• Continue to have Neubrand, Baranovich and Co. LLC perform accounting services;

• Revise the ordinance addressing signs in Industrial Park;

• Redeem or renew the capital improvement certificate of deposit that matures Nov. 14;

• Hire GWS Contractors for installation of the Leadington booster station;

• Approve the annual Christmas holiday decorating contest; and

• Approve the purchase and distribution of hams or turkeys to city employees during the holiday season.

Paula Barr is a reporter for the Daily Journal and can be reached at 573-431-2010, ext. 172 or at pbarr@dailyjournalonline.com.

Share Story

E-mail this story E-mail   Print this story Print   Share  
Post To MySpace! MySpace
   Digg! Digg This!   Delicious Delicious       
Article Comments Article Comments (8)
The comments below are from readers and do not represent the views of the Daily Journal.
Apnatic posted at Tuesday, November 24th, 2009 at 11:55 am

I have lived in Park Hills for 15 yrs now, very seldom do we see a dog or even cat without a leash. There have been 2 big dogs occassionally running about in the evening, but not for quite a while. Thanks Park Hills for keeping on top of the situation. If it is a "personal" fight, it sounds to me like it is, someone needs to be in charge, make a decision, and move on. On another note, any suggestions for us our neighbor lives in Desloge, we are in Park Hills, they shoot rabbits with bb guns and throw body in obscure places, only hear the shots, see the dead rabbits in our yard...who takes charge of this? This has been going on for more than a year.
itoldyouso posted at Wednesday, November 18th, 2009 at 10:26 am

Personally, I don't have a dog in this fight. But, if it was up to me, I'd let the dogs settle matters out back behind the barn.
co-der posted at Wednesday, November 18th, 2009 at 8:23 am

I would like to see PH to actually enforce a leash law. I cannot tell you how many times I have had to come to a stop or go around a dog in the street. If the owners do not care enough for the safety of their animals, then the animals should be removed. An accident is inevitable, and I doubt the dog owners would be held responsible. Not to mention children who play in their own yard and have to be exposed to dogs running loose.
paisley posted at Wednesday, November 18th, 2009 at 7:30 am

i just have to say that i know kim and tom gibson personally, and they take very good care of their dogs, treat them like part of the family, so i have a hard time believing it was their dogs that instigated the fight or that kim let go of their leashes. it sounds like the other lady has some more 'splainin to do if she had her dogs on a 25 foot lead and they attacked the other dogs. i hope the truth comes out, guys.
pastres posted at Tuesday, November 17th, 2009 at 11:44 pm

as a past resident of Park Hills aka Flat River,,,,,when I seen that one of the issues on the table was the approval for the purchase and distribution of hams or turkeys for city employees,,,,I was surprised,,,they still must be employed if they are city employees. Why not purchase and distribute to the ones who aren't employed? Just asking. I may not live there anymore,,,but my family does and I still care.
oldmantaylor posted at Tuesday, November 17th, 2009 at 7:42 pm

I've spent most of my life living in Flat River/Park Hills, and I have spent most of that time complaining about the decisions that the city has made.

However, in the last few months of reading in the Daily Journal about the problems other cities in the area are having, I have to say that I'm pretty satisfied with the way things are going in Park Hills.
teacher1 posted at Tuesday, November 17th, 2009 at 6:46 pm

I think the city needs to look into a dog barking ordinance too. I'm not sure what the law is in PH but the house next door is a rental house. EVERY single person that's moved in has dogs. Not just little, inside dogs-great big huge BARKING dogs. It goes on all hours of the night. I've complained and yet nothing is ever done. It's very annoying and I'm tired of it. It would be nice if there is a complaint for someone to follow up on it.
old cynic posted at Tuesday, November 17th, 2009 at 5:18 pm

Flat River sure spends lots of time talking about animals. Monkeys, snakes, and now....dogs on 25 foot leashes pulling a wheelchair.
Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to leave comments

*Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 

Not a member? Register now.

Member Center Member Center

advertisement

signup E-mail updates

Get news update delivered to your inbox.
E-Mail:
First:
Last:
Zip:

Featured Marketplace Ad

Search the YP
Featured Businesses